I felt so "at home" with your practice, your...
3 minutes ago in Humbird, US
By Melanie DesChatelets, BSc(h), ND • August 16th, 2011

There are numerous diet plans out there, all touting to be the best. Some are better than others but how do you decipher this information? Lists that rank and discuss pros and cons of the most common commercial diets are available and always subject to the authors’ biases. Beyond all the marketing of slender figures there are some less sexy, black and white documents found in the databases of PubMed that have looked at this clinical question objectively.
Background 101: How to dissect a commercial diet for weight loss.
In order to dissect a diet plan you need to assess it for these 3 main characteristics. First, understanding the recommended proportions of macronutrients, is it low carb, low fat/high carb or some other perfect mix. Secondly, understand the caloric restriction expected. What was this number based upon; will exercise be encouraged or discouraged? Thirdly, what are the beneficial or detrimental side effects this diet will so generously provide. Is weight loss the bottom-line or are things like life expectancy worth taking a look at too.
Numéro un: Macronutrient proportions head to head
The major difference in most diets are the way in which they may emphasize or de-emphasizes certain macronutrient groups. To analyze the diet you want to embark on you must understand their rational, if any, for they’re magical weight loss secret.
When these 3 diets were put head to head in a controlled study setting here were the results. The fastest amount of weight loss occurred in the first six months of this 2-year trial for all diet types. At six months the low-carb diet (Atkin’s) showed the most significant weight loss. At the end of the trial, 2 years later, the Mediterranean diet and the Atkin’s diet demonstrated equal average weight loss of 4.4kg and 4.5kg respectively. These results highlighting that...
Tags : calorie restrictionLocation: Vancouver, CA
Mélanie DesChâtelets, BSc(h), ND, is a licensed Naturopathic Physician committed to recognizing and attending to the fundamental antecedents of illness. Using the synergistic power of groundbreaking scientificevidence and long standing historical evidence in natural medicine, Mélanie strives to empower individuals to...
Aziraphale
I've been on a ketogenic VLCD previously, and lost 21 kg in 3 months. After coming off the diet, I had a moderate gain of 5kg and stuck there for about 9 months, and then my weight dramatically increased - partly due to an event which resulted in PTSD. 3 years later, I am 25kg heavier than I was pre-VLCD.
I know the weight gain was partly down to an extraordinary external event, but I think one of the biggest problems was how easy the VLCD was. It was incredibly easy to stick to and the virtually guaranteed loss each week was incredibly motivating. This meant that, whilst I was given all the right tools to deal with a proper diet after the fasting (including CBT), it was all too easy to think that if I gained a bit I could just go back on the diet again.
Interestingly, most people I know who have been on VLCDs report a similar problem - its incredibly easy the first time, but virtually impossible to go back to after you've been off it for a while.
8 months ago in London, GB